No, the steam has not too many games

Every now and then another graph out the growing number of games on Steam. It is usually accompanied by a lot of moaning about space, quality control, and if we're really unlucky, mentions an Indiepocalypse. We are apparently drowned in an infinite ocean of shovelware and if we're very lucky the worst that will happen is...? I'm never sure, actually. Be forced to use a filter on the search of the steam function? Be exposed to titles that I would ever see? Get the same feel browsing lists of the new version, I used to get navigation grids to the electronic shop of back in the day? Apparently, it's a terrible thing.

The market for the sale of games has seen incredible has changed over the past 15 years. Independent developers have always been around but it didn't used to be as much and they last so close to the star it's incredible to see someone created anything. It took a little miracle of luck and just the right person on a game site carefully to get any attention at all and even then, the game can only get a buzz shortly before his death in the sea. People kept doing things, because that's what people do, but as a general rule, all information has been mostly found only on the site of the web developer and you had to bring a healthy dose of confidence to return the credit card details if you have decided to buy something.

How determine if she is worthy content or any size simply?

Retail has had its share of problems too, with the release of major publishers that dominates the shelves, leaving little room for the little ones. There were hundreds and hundreds of games to throw himself into the world, console and PC, and the level of quality has been all over the map. There are indie, shovelware and AAA of different levels of quality gems all the side-by-side and the only reason why games more dominate because they were the ones who pay for shelf space. Do you have any idea how hunting games, there used? Or the volume of clones of Wolfenstein there even after Doom had rewritten the FPS landscape? Don't even get me started on the Myst-alikes, mascot platformers and forget terrible fighting games. The total amount of securities may have been less but so was the number of people who buy them, and the quality level was about the same.

This is decades later and storage space is not a problem. The digital showcase is infinite and there are a lot more people buy, but PC sales are on Steam. Valve realized he had a problem a few years back, just to have a digital distribution platform that digital distribution platform. If a game has not got on Steam, it could also well be dead, with the exception of Minecraft. GOG, itch.io, Humble and other sites are all good places to pick up a new PC game, but large sales figures are on Steam. It is not a position that Valve has asked, but it's one the company was stuck with, so in recent years it has established ways to deal being involuntary Porter and the content of the PC. It started in 2012 with Greenlight and shortly after that the floodgates have been opened.

A strange is not all fact-classic since 2000, but how do we decide if it is worthy or just old?

Almost anyone with a computer decent semi can make a game of today. GameMaker, unit, unreal, and a number of other engines of pre-built are accessible easily and cheaply to the creators, rather than the previous days when you either had to reinvent the wheel with each new game, adapt an internal motor, if you worked in a bigger promoter, or purchase a license for an existing engine and nailing the game to adapt to its restrictions. Barriers to creation are still quite large, but at least they are affordable rather than the mind-numbingly dreadful. The result is that there are a lot more projects underway, and most end up on Steam.

According to a vocal part of the community, the amount of games is a problem. The view, it seems that there is a torrent of crap that strangle the system of in, degrading the steam and it is impossible to find quality games the system was known for. Bad Rats, it should be noted, was released in 2009. There has always been bad games and they have always shown, but now all the volume is turned to eleven.

Mobile ports darn pesky, cluttering up the purity of the game on PC!

Even with all that, however, there is no GLUT, no Indiepocalypse, no rush self-destructive to flood the sacred rooms of steam with waste more than a service could hold ever maybe. Here's the important thing about steam - it is not perfect, never been, is not supposed to be, and never become like that. This is a showcase game where a developer if she wants any kind of success, should be, and Valve acknowledges. The company has provided filter options, make major updates of detectability and users a number of tools to find what they want. Cut things to a manageable level that corresponds to the user's interests should not be particularly difficult.

Still, for the sake of argument, lets talk about what could go. Personally I can't stand visual novels, Tower Defence and sports games, so with the lot of them. One of the styles constantly griped about is that what anyone using the 'retro' art, in order to get rid of everything looking like that. A lot of people can't stand indie games, believing that if she doesn't have a Publisher (EA, XSEED, anyone) then he has no business being on the service, let thus kills them too. Anything with the word "Simulator" in the title? In the trash it goes. A bit more basic filtering and we have a store front that eventually removed all the theoretical, that everyone wanted gone, although all this is obtained out there is the games of valve-published and Grand Theft Auto V.

Of course, we gave it a 4.5 out of 5 on the exam and that he sits on page 2 of the list of best sellers, but look at that old style of pixel. Could not be less Steam-worthy if he tried.

Steam is not all things to everyone. This isn't the purpose of a store or a retail portal. Go to any retailer on the planet to sell any product you care to mention, filter the things you don't personally care, and the remaining percentage will be roughly similar to what is on Steam. Role of the steam in the game on PC has evolved over the years and Valve is trying to meet the challenge, a little slowly and with the fake casual not along the way (why is not yet dead Greenlight?, but improving at a steady pace.) It's not perfect, but getting better and close the doors to an arbitrary but huge games amount do not help anyone. Yes, very well, about 40 percent of the games on Steam have been released in 2016, but for what? In 2007, the increase was nearly 60%, from 77 to 189.

These numbers are not important, but. What is important is that people have the tools to create, sometimes poised to amazing things, sometimes including less surprising, but it is not work of steam to tell people what to like. Steam turned on the market of the first game and his job is to allow access to the games, and if people do much then Steam will focus as much as possible. Both variants are bad and worse - either steam rejects games based on the standards making the developers and disgruntled consumers almost unanimously or stop people from creating things. Neither is happening anytime soon, so maybe it is better to focus on the things that we can enjoy and not worry too much, even if you filtered every thing that is unresponsive to your liking because of genre or just be bad, there are even more fantastic games you will could never play in a life.